編者按：

2011年11月，由北京故宮博物院、中國古陶瓷學會、福建省文物局、德化縣人民政府共同主辦的“2011中國瓷都?德化窯學術研討會”在瓷都德化舉辦，近百位國內外博物館館長、從事陶瓷文化研究的專家學者齊聚瓷都德化，以“的故鄉、瓷藝術的搖籃”為主題，共同研討深厚的德化窯陶瓷文化。

研討會共提交專題論文39篇，其中不乏外國專家的作品。與會的專家學者以翔實的圖文史料為佐證，從學術專業的角度對德化窯在國內外陶瓷文化領域的歷史地位和影響做了全面深刻的闡述，是一筆難得的、豐碩的學術成果。

近期，《外國人眼中的“”》欄目將再次回顧刊載該研討會的相關論文，并對其中的論文進行翻譯，為廣大德化陶瓷文化研究愛好者提供學習、交流、參考。

Dehua Ceramics in Long-distance Trade in the Song- Yuan period: excavations at Satingpra, South Thailand（八）

Janice Stargardt  翻譯：孫延燕

It can be seen that this chemical analysis permits secure distinctions to be made in particular between Jingdezhen and Dehua ceramics, even when they are found in a fragmented state as was the case at the Satingpra sites.

從五種瓷器的四種主要成分的化學分析可以看出，景德鎮陶瓷和德化陶瓷之間存在明顯的區別，即使它們在塞丁普拉窯址發現時處于支離破碎的狀態。

It remains now to discuss certain absences from the record of Chinese ceramics at Satingpra and to form an overview of the significance of the ceramics present in terms of the trade flowing in the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean for some 400 years. It is noteworthy that so far no Changsha ceramics have been found in South Thailand, although they were exported to Japan at approximately the time that Chinese ceramics began arriving at Satingpra. Similarly, no Yueh ceramics have been found in the Satingpra area, although they were exported to the Palembang area of South-east Sumatra at that time. Professor Zhu Boqian points out, however, that specimens from the Ou kilns have sometimes in the past been identified as Yueh wares. Another major absence at the end of the ceramic sequence is blue-and-white wares. No specimens of blue-and-white ceramics have been found in an archaeological context in the Satinpra group of sites.

現在，我們來討論一些在塞丁普拉沒有發現的中國陶瓷器，并對這些陶瓷制品400多年來在南中國海和印度洋貿易中的重要性做一個概述。值得注意的是，迄今為止在泰國南部沒有發現長沙窯陶瓷，盡管它們大約在中國陶瓷器進入塞丁普拉時開始出口到日本。同樣，在塞丁普拉地區也沒有發現越窯陶器，雖然它們當時被出口到蘇門答臘島東南的巨港地區。朱伯謙教授指出，在過去，歐窯的標本有時被認為是越窯的。另一個在陶瓷序列里遺失的是青白釉器皿。在塞丁普拉遺址的考古背景下，沒有任何青白釉陶瓷標本被發現。

責任編輯：陳美珠